Table of Contents
The National Association for the Education of Young Children
(NAEYC) commends all parties involved in this newsletter venture to promote
communication and information exchange among early childhood professionals teaching in the
primary grades. Although our Association has always focused on the full span of
development from birth to age eight, the majority of members have been teachers working
with children from infancy through age five. This past decade, NAEYC has
aggressively worked to provide more immediately relevant information and resources to
teachers working in the primary grades, and these efforts have stimulated increasing
numbers of primary teachers to become active members of NAEYC. The resource that has
undoubtedly reaped the greatest influence is our position statement on Developmentally
Appropriate Practice (DAP). In fact, it is not uncommon to hear kindergarten or primary
teachers refer to us as "that DAP organization," rather than as NAEYC.
I want to appeal to each reader to take personal responsibility for introducing NAEYC
to primary teachers. We can provide you with complimentary copies of our journal, Young
Children, and our Resource Catalog (membership information is
included) to give to prospective members. Call 1-800-424-2460, and ask for the Membership
Department. The majority of NAEYC members became involved in this organization
through the efforts of a colleague or professor. One-on-one invitations to primary
teachers to join us will greatly increase our shared efforts to improve the quality of all
early childhood education for all young children.
Sincerely,
Marilyn M. Smith, Executive Director
National Association for the Education of Young Children
The Final Report of the Advisory Committee on Head Start Quality and Expansion has been
issued by the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Entitled Creating
A 21st Century Head Start, the document sets forth recommendations to
the federal government, to Head Start parents and professionals, and to other interested
citizens. The recommendations are intended to implement the following three principles:
(1) We must ensure that every Head Start program can deliver on Head Start's vision, by
striving for excellence in serving both children and families.
(2) We must expand the number of children served and the scope of services provided in
a way that is more responsive to the needs of children and families.
(3) We must encourage Head Start to forge partnerships with key community
and state institutions and programs in early childhood, family support, health, education,
and mental health, and we must ensure that these partnerships are constantly renewed and
recrafted to fit changes in families, communities, and state and national policies.
According to the report, "policymakers and practitioners have a greater
understanding of the importance of the 0 - 8 period and a new vision of systemic early
childhood education reform." The Advisory Committee advocates that high quality
comprehensive services be provided from Head Start through the primary grades. It also
agrees with the National Task Force on School Readiness that educators and parents need to
move beyond a goal of transition "as filling the gap between two different types of
programs" and towards a goal "'of ensuring developmentally appropriate education
services, parent involvement, and supportive services for children from birth through the
primary grades."
As part of its recommendations the Advisory Committee suggests certain action steps,
many of which relate specifically to the primary grades. Some of these are:
- Federal education dollars should be used to facilitate school reforms which
ensure that gains made by Head Start children are sustained in the primary grades.
- Changes should be made in federal state, and local policies to better meet the
developmental needs of children and to support the involvement and participation of their
families.
- Head Start programs must help parents to understand how the public schools operate and
provide techniques for communicating with teachers and other school personnel, for
influencing school policy, and for supporting their child's work at home.
- Joint training and technical assistance should be provided to Head Start directors and
staff and to public school administrators and staff on transition. Such training might
include the following components:
- how both Head Start and schools can better understand the developmental needs of young
children;
- how the early childhood community, including Head Start, can participate in developing
state content standards for the early grades;
- how schools can maintain links initiated by Head Start between children and community
health services, as well as receive existing health records;
- how both communities can break down perceived barriers to increased communication and
collaboration; and
- how both communities can develop the capacity to effectively meet the special needs of
children with diverse learning styles.
Single copies of the Advisory Committee's report are available at no cost from the
Public Affairs Office, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for
Children and Families, 370 L'Enfant Promenade, S.W., Washington, DC 20447.
A consensus on what primary classrooms should look like is emerging, as educators and
policymakers target the early elementary grades for improvement. Leading experts are now
seeking to remedy the neglect which the early childhood years in the elementary school
have received as an area of education reform during the last two decades. It is essential
that "'in the context of rapidly changing demographics and family structures, this
country must find ways to improve dramatically instruction in the primary grades,"
writes David A. Hamburg, President of the Carnegie Corporation of New York in the foreword
to Carol E. Copple's Starting Right: Reforming Education in the Early Grades
(Prekindergarten through Grade 3), a report based on a meeting held at the
Carnegie Corporation of New York on June 1 and 2, 1992.
During the Carnegie meeting, Penelope Peterson, Professor and Co-Director of the Center
for the Learning and Teaching of Elementary Subjects, Michigan State University, presented
a list of attributes which became the basis for the characteristics delineated, as
follows, in the reports Exhibit 1:
What Should Early Grades Classrooms Look Like?
The Teacher and Teaching
- The teacher does more questioning than telling, lecturing, or explaining.
- The teacher does more listening than talking.
- The teacher encourages and values multiple approaches, ways of thinking, and ideas
rather than a single approach, way of thinking, or idea.
- The teacher focuses on the strengths, knowledge, and understandings that children bring
to the classroom from their culture, families, and formal and informal learning rather
than on their deficiencies or misunderstanding.
Students and Classroom Discourse
- Classroom discourse is more like conversation than lecture-recitation.
- Students' knowledge, thinking, and understandings are made "visible" through
oral and written discourse rather than remaining invisible or implicit in written answers
to worksheets.
- The students and the teacher use, discuss, and build on students' ideas rather than only
using and discussing the teacher's ideas or those in a textbook.
- Students personally commit to, and assume greater responsibility for, their own learning
rather than complying with teacher demands or responding to external consequences.
- Students collaborate rather than only compete in solving problems, in reasoning, in
their involvement in inquiry, and in written and oral discourse.
Content
- Complex, meaningful problems are posed and challenging, "worthwhile" tasks are
constructed by the teacher and the students.
- The focus is on depth rather than breadth of content coverage.
- Knowledge consists of more than just right answers, facts, or information.
Contexts of Learning
- The classroom becomes an authentic learning community rather than assembly line or
workplace.
- Students' ideas are respected and valued; students are supported for taking risks,
offering ideas, and making mistakes; and teachers as well as students revise their
thinking and understandings as they learn together.
- Children's in-school experiences are related to their out-of-school experiences and
culture.
- from Starting Right: Reforming Education in the Early Grades
(Prekindergarten through Grade 3), pp. 5-6
The Iowa and Nebraska Departments of Education have jointly published The
Primary Program: Growing and Learning in the Heartland, a
comprehensive guide to assist those who are planning learning activities for children in
kindergarten and the primary grades. In a collaborative effort, educators from these two
states worked for over a year to produce a document which "represents the best of
what teachers know about how young children grow and learn". An unique aspect of this
endeavor is that the Ministry of Education in British Columbia gave the Iowa and Nebraska
Departments permission to adapt and reprint work which had been done in Canada.
The Primary Program is centered on the need for a shift in the
way we (administrators, parents, school board members, and teachers) all think about
teaching and learning. Young children are physically and mentally active, constantly using
language and interacting with people and objects around them, yet the paradigm which
guides their schooling often does not recognize that they are physically and
intellectually different than adults. Classroom behaviors which are challenging and
difficult to deal with may, in fact, be the result of the paradigm of schooling which
values quiet, adult-like classrooms.
Authors of The Primary Program believe that:
school needs to be a place where problems are posed and solutions are generated;
where mistakes are made and valued as learning experiences; where cooperation is nurtured
in the face of conflict; where teachers, parents, and children make decisions together
about what is best for the children.
In order for schools to become active and interactive environments, in which adults and
children can be nurtured and be successful, there must be a shift from the traditional
schooling paradigm to a continuum of change. The Primary Program proposes
the implementation of the following shift, adapted from Dr. Patricia K. Arlin's opening
address, "New Beginnings," May, 1989, U.B.C., based on Doris Pronin Fromberg's
"'Kindergarten: Current Circumstances Affecting Curriculum," Teachers' College
Record, 90, pp. 392-43:
A
Paradigm Shift |
| Shift from: |
To: |
| Child Adapts |
Schools adapt |
Child as passive
Child as dependent
Whole group instruction |
Child as active
Child as a partner in learning
Whole group, small group, and individual instruction |
| Individual tasks |
Balanced small groups, cooperative and individual tasks |
Preset material is covered
3 R's instructional focus |
Children's capacity to learn is extended
Focus on concepts, skills, processes, and attitudes in five goal areas |
Separate subjects
Workbooks |
Integrated subjects
Concrete materials, quality literature, and a variety of resource materials |
| Verbal information emphasis |
Constructivist, problem-solving, thinking emphasis |
Single corret answers
Work and play divided
Holiday rituals marked |
Alternative solutions are generated
Play is one condition of learning
Multicultural content is based on the study of social experience |
Teacher as the sole arbitrator of what is correct
Grouping is by ability or age |
Children as theory builders and negotiators
Group is developed by interest, motivation, and learning needs |
| Assessment is of what a child already knows |
Assessment focuses on how a child learns and what a child
"can do" |
| Assessment is for classification and reporting |
Assessment is ongoing for purposes of instructional
decision-making |
Child is recipient of the teacher's teaching
Answers are valued
Paper and pencil representations |
Child is collaborator in own learning
Questions are valued
Multiple ways of representing knowledge. |
|
| The Primary Program: Growing
and Learning in the Heartland, a 650-page guide to developing appropriate learning
environments for kindergarten and primary age students, may be ordered from the Office of
Child Development, Nebraska Department of Education, 301 Centennial Mall South, P. 0. Box
94987, Lincoln, Nebraska 685094987. The cost is $25 each, plus $7 postage and handling per
copy for orders outside of Iowa and Nebraska. |
REPRINT POLICY
Material contained in Of Primary Interest may be reprinted in other forms, such as books, -newsletters, or journals, provided that a copy of such reprinting is sent to the Colorado Department of Education, and that the reprinting contains the name Of Primary Interest and the fact that this newsletter is published cooperatively by the Colorado Association for the Education of Young Children and the Colorado Department of Education. Permission to make photocopies is not required if the copies are to share with parents, teachers, or students; for library reserve; or for personal use; however, the name Of Primary Interest, as well as the logos of the two sponsoring agencies, must appear on the copy. Additional issues of the publication may be requested from the editor at the Colorado Department of Education.
ASCD (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development) has published In
Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms, by
Jacqueline Grennon Brooks and Martin G. Brooks. Constructivism, the process by which
people construct their own understandings of the world in which they live, is the means by
which teachers may facilitate a learning environment "where students search for
meaning, appreciate uncertainty, and inquire responsibly"
Using constructivist principles to argue for school reform, Grennon Brooks and Brooks
formulate 12 characteristics of constructivist teachers. These "descriptors" are
based on the authors' interactions with students, on their observations in classrooms, and
on the work of such researchers and theoreticians as Arlin, Elkind, Kuhn, and Sigel.
Constructivist teachers:
- encourage and accept student autonomy and initiative.
- use raw data and primary sources, along with manipulative, interactive, and physical
materials.
- use cognitive terminology such as "classify," "analyze," "predict," and "create," when framing tasks.
- allow student responses to drive lessons, shift instructional strategies, and alter
content.
- inquire about students' understandings of concepts before sharing their own
understandings of those concepts.
- encourage students to engage in dialogue, both with the teacher and with one another.
- encourage student inquiry by asking thoughtful, open-ended questions and encouraging
students to ask questions of each other.
- seek elaboration of students' initial responses.
- engage students in experiences that might engender contradictions to their initial
hypotheses and then encourage discussion.
- allow wait time after posing questions.
- provide time for students to construct relationships and create metaphors.
- nurture students' natural curiosity through frequent use of the learning cycle model.

Although The Case for Constructivist Classrooms
is written for teachers of students of all ages, primary-level teachers are a central
focus of this audience. Many of the examples provided take place in primary classrooms.
The authors conclude by providing six "bold" recommendations, which all teachers
need to consider:
- Structure preservice and inservice teacher education around constructivist principles
and practices.
- Jettison most standardized testing and make assessment meaningful for students.
- Focus resources more on teachers' professional development than on textbooks and
workbooks.
- Eliminate letter and number grades.
- Form school-based study groups focused on human developmental principles.
- Require annual seminars on teaching and learning for administrators and school board
members.
The Case for Constructivist Classrooms (Stock #611-93748Y69)
may be ordered from ASCD, 1250 N. Pitt Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-1453
(703-549-9110) for $13.95 plus a $2.50 handling charge.